Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Mental Health Issues

What the U.S.A. really needs is improvement and support of inpatient mental health facilities.  Every time there is a shooting many people start crying for gun control.  The problem with that mentality is that you only make it harder for law-abiding citizens to obtain firearms, you'll never, I repeat, NEVER get the guns out of the hands of the criminal elements of society.  One of the REAL problems is the deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill.  For example, in the Gabrielle Giffords shooting in Tucson, AZ, the shooter's family actually attempted to get help for their son - but until he actually DID something to prove he was a danger to society, the institutions would not take him.  Rather than getting him help and having him prove himself safe, he got no help and ended up proving himself quite unsafe.

Under President Kennedy, may he rest in peace, there were attempts to bring attention and support to the needs of the mentally ill.  Eunice Shriver went on to found the Special Olympics, which to this day does a lot of good for that community.(1)  However, the funds and attention contributed more toward deinstitutionalization.  Funds raised went to institutions which cared for the mentally ill - but primarily to those which did outpatient treatment. 

Reducing costs (2)
As hospitalisation costs increased, both the federal and state governments were motivated to find less expensive alternatives to hospitalisation. The 1965 amendments to Social Security shifted about 50% of the mental health care costs from states to the federal government, motivating the government to promote deinstitutionalisation.

The increase in homelessness was seen as related to deinstitutionalisation. Studies from the late 1980s indicated that one-third to one-half of homeless people had severe psychiatric disorders, often co-occurring with substance abuse. (3)(4)(5)

A process of indirect cost-shifting may have led to a form of "re-institutionalisation" through the increased use of jail detention for those with mental disorders deemed unmanageable and noncompliant. When laws were enacted requiring communities to take more responsibility for mental health care, necessary funding was often absent, and jail became the default option, being cheaper than psychiatric care.

In summer 2009, author and columnist Heather Mac Donald stated in City Journal, "jails have become society's primary mental institutions, though few have the funding or expertise to carry out that role properly... at Rikers, 28 percent of the inmates require mental health services, a number that rises each year."(6)

So, what we really need is better funding for the mentally ill - which would help with the homeless situation as well as potentially heading off some of the violent incidents previously discussed. 

(1) and


(3) Rubin, Lillian B. (Fall 2007). "Sand Castles and Snake Pits: Homelessness, Public Policy, and the Law of Unintended Consequences". Dissent. 

(4) Friedman, Michael B. (8 August 2003). "Keeping The Promise of Community Mental Health". The Journal News.

(5) McQuistion, Hunter L.; Finnerty, Molly; Hirschowitz, Jack; Susser, Ezra S. (May 2003). "Challenges for psychiatry in serving homeless people with psychiatric disorders". Psychiatric Services 54 (5): 669–76. doi:10.1176/ PMID 12719496.

(6) Mac Donald, Heather. "The Jail Inferno". City Journal. Retrieved 27 July 2009.

2015 Pi Day is coming!

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Baptist Pastor Calls for Execution of Homosexuals

A Baptist "pastor" in Tempe, AZ made a comment: 
"If you execute the homos, you wouldn't have all these AIDS running rampant."

Well, if that quote is accurate - not only is this "pastor" quite irresponsible - he also needs a lesson in grammar.  Executing all homosexuals would, indeed, reduce the number of AIDS cases in the world since the majority of AIDS is still found amongst the homosexual community, but to say that is morally reprehensible, especially for one who claims to be a "pastor."  The equivalent would be to say, "If you executed everyone in north-western Africa, you wouldn't have all these cases of Ebola running rampant."  Again, a true statement, but is it moral to kill everyone in that portion of Africa to eradicate a disease which exists among part of their population?

Where is the Christian outcry against this "pastor?"  A friend of mine points out:
The thought came to me today that executing gays was once an idea that the Church tolerated when it was introduced by the Christian Emperors Justinian & Theodosius.
My response was "the Church tolerated a lot of things which were culturally acceptable throughout history."  Case in point, the Church today tolerates the homosexual community!  Considering that homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord, as declared in several places by Scripture, the Church could easily "justify" supporting this Baptist "pastor" and the outlandish statement - but instead she offers a welcome to them, and yes, prays and hopes for their conversion and rejection of the sinful lifestyle, but does not outright reject homosexual persons.

My friend added:
I thought it interesting that locally Fr. (now excommunicated) Vernon Myers spoke up against what the Baptist pastor was saying.
Meyer (now affiliated with the Sun Lakes Church of Christ) was excommunicated from the Catholic Church (automatically, he actually excommunicated himself by the act he took) when he rejected Church authority and "ordained" a woman to the priesthood.  
Perhaps a better rendition of this Baptist "pastor" if found here:
"Because if you executed the homos, like God recommends, you wouldn't have all this AIDS running rampant,"
Grammatically, that is better - but still an outrageous statement.  In that article it also mentions Meyer speaking out against the Baptist "pastor."   From what I could find, here is what Meyer said:
"I see a lot of drama," said Pastor Vernon Meyer with Sun Lakes United Church of Christ. "That's very offensive when he says 'homo'."
Anderson does more than use the disparaging term. In his sermon, he stated, "All homos are pedophiles. There, I said it, they're all pedophiles."
"He's a liar," Meyer said.
More later on this story...